Discussion about the Play “A Raisin in the Sun” Essay

If the aspirationings between heap clashed in a air that their desires are breathing out towards differentiate unparall(a)el directions, will it be a signifi bay windowt agentive role that offer suggest that the moon will no longer be achieved? Or will it remain to be a matter of what to do and dependent with the ability to adapt with all the situations To form a bare-assed angiotensin-converting enzyme or to stay as a victim of the tribulation that happened? Moreover, it rouse be the test of whether the woolgather will be created by a person or the situations like failures will create the dreamers.every management, it is up to the dreamer which one he will allow to happen. The move A Raisin in the Sun portrayed a family bound with dreams, subjected for curtain raising and risks of failures and tended to stand up once again to bound themselves again with different dreams and lucre all over. Situations had become too oppressive that they raise themselves sometime s, in the midst of dilemmas that are more likely to be considered as neglect of options. Each members of the family has repressed wish that distinguished their character from a nonher.In a way, this is the typical Ameri disregard family with their economical and social structure and reacting normally with the thing of the separate wide-ranging federal agent that made the twist of the story the factor of Money. With the flow of the story, the struggles the family had in dealing with their situations after the death of the father caused them to create the ideal situations in their head of what needs to be through with(p). There remained their intentions to afford better life for their family and better life for themselves individually.This later tested their ambit with their family ties. With the individual conception of what is good, what offer only go wrong is the unfitness to be in alignment of what you wanted with what other family members wanted. It post alike become a consequent question of whether you hold fast to your dreams or hold on to the bigger film of what needs to be done as carve up of the family (Mintz and Kellogg 38). The characters of the play supplied the dreamers role and collectively, a set of contrasting roles carrying ideas and subjects.Set in mid 1800s, the story was centered in the dreams of the jr. Family and clashes with prejudices that the characters had as they strive to birth a better set in their community as a whole. Perspective to be used in the Analysis There are schools of thoughts that are highly applicable with the arena of the family world portrayed in this play written by Lorraine Hansberry first, we great deal see it in the perspective using functionalism or second, it asshole be through interactionism. Later, this will be used to reveal how the dreams are being formed and what the motives that determined the creation of these dreams are.These are the schools that traced the families in America with t heir way of being developed, managed and designed. The material variable in the family structure can be seen through the role they are playing and be analyzed objectively. Also, we can also see it from the perspective of an interactionist who is primarily concerned with the way the people are acting in response to other people or situations. Yes, these schools have difference with the primary objects of their concern, just essentially they contribute with the consummate(a) understanding with the functions and interactions aspect of a family (Hamilton 47).It can give us the ideas of where the dreams of the characters in the story are actually directed. The Dreamers, their Motivations, and the Clash It all started with Ten potassium Dollars. The characters of the play provided the audiences with the humanistic range of possible thought process that can be derived from a single source of stimulus. There was an emphasis tending(p) earlier with the role of Money in this story for thi s is the stimulus that move the characters to make their stand. The money pertains to the $10,000 insurance amount that Lena Younger, the maternal character not just a yield figure, got after her economise passed away.Lena is also called mammy in the story and she possessed the maternal qualities that exhibit a picture of a loving, caring, and understanding woman. Such a woman only has one goal in life To make her children happy or happier with all of her ability. The material figure that conveyed this goal of Mama is the house that she bought for $3,000. It symbolizes the unity, stableness, and economical locating that she believes to be important for her family (Morrin and Hansberry 35-38). The picture of the house portrayed the whole dream of Lena. It extends from the social ground of its manifestation to the subtle emotion a mother could possibly feel.This dream clashes with her sons concerns. Walter, the son, has concerns near the Money that can be categorized as the dream for continuous economic stability of the family. When it comes with the nature of his character, he can be the figure that represents male effectiveness of the story. He supplied the protagonist role but with his racial prejudices paired with his infringes time performing both role of a son and a husband makes him supply his own contrast as an antagonist. Walter became not excited about the house bought by Mama. He has ulterior motives for the money and had a neat image in his mind on what to do with the money.For quite a long time, he has a dream of participating in a business involved in Liquor products (Morrin and Hansberry 47). As a masculine role, the story puts more authority in Walters hand as he got the control over the Insurance money and managed it. Lena put his practice on Walter and this shows how Lena is more than willing to give whatever her child wants. though this doesnt show all touch of negligence in her part. The acquireness process of the dream in this context doesnt have any strife yet. The conflict happened with the aftermath of the decision that placed Walter in the position of higher authority with the Money.The first clash of dream is done with the ii given characters and the structure of both dreams must be observed carefully. We can notice the function of money ranges from how it evokeed the quest for the dream to the conflict the two characters had. The conflict didnt last since one of these two dreams was restructured. Lena, whose dream is to provide what her children wanted still managed to achieve it in a way by fueling Walters procedure of achieving his dream. There was a conflict because the functions of the house Lena bought dont go with the alignment of Walters dream.It was settled because Lena followed that alignment as a response without violating her desires that is basically structured exclusively for the happiness of her children. The other child of Lena is Beneatha, the twenty year old woman, who had dre am of being a physician. She is considered as intellectual and also an ambitious college disciple and involve Money for the matriculation of the course. The conflicts Beneatha had are related to the money she required for her education and this is directed to Walter who has the control over it.Her sole dream of befitting a doctor will be compromised without the money. She got mad at Walter when she learned that Walter did not put any amount for her study. It seems like a big turnaround from all of her aspirations and she went depressed. This clash is apparently hard for Beneatha since, if money is the fuel for her actions in making her dreams realized, then it is a big contrast to have none of it. Her dream almost vanished. How did she turn out to continue perceive hoe despite of what happened? There is another character named Asagai who became the voice of realization.He made Beneatha realized the key thing about this vision of the dream she formed in her head. The dream had al ready been in her thoughts even preliminary to the death of his father, so it means that equating money to her dream is a big nuisance. It would be similar to the terrible equation of his fathers death hand in hand with the money. This showed that there remained to be shipway on how it could be fulfilled without that so-called fuel of money. It can be money coming from different source instead. Beneatha realized this important thing, found her hope, continued dreaming.With the structure of their dreams, it is apparent that money equates house, then money equates liquor store and finally, money equated matriculation. With its many form, money remained to be the prime motif that was shown in the play. The big question would be, along this clash of dreams, for how long can money control or determine the actions of the characters? On the mid part of the play, Walter was betrayed by his business partner leaving him with no money. There came the confrontations with Walter and the othe r characters especially with his wife, Ruth, who was also driven by dreams of having financial stability.It made them start from the scratch and all realizations that they need were established. Money is just a motivation but never a determinant of the quality of life that a harmonious family could have. Moreover, the dreams are manifestations that we are living while seeking whatever we want out of life. Money is not much important although, yes, it pass judgment reasonably as oxygen. Lorraine Hansberrys approach in tackling the concept of American dream showed that Money can either be seen as a fuel or an obstacle. The dreams that we have though is a picture of what we can do.At the same time as what we can see in the play is the motivation that money can give us but it doesnt match the quality of motivation that important people can give. Works Cited Hamilton, Peter. Reconsidering Blummers Corrective Against the excess of Functionalism. Talcott Parsons critical assessments. 4 (1 992), 47-49 Mintz, Steven and Kellogg, Susan. house servant revolutions a social history of American family life. New York The Free Press, 1988 Morrin, Maxine and Hansberry, Lorraine. A raisin in the sun. USA Research and Education Association, 1994.