Despite the rhetoric of employee engagement, organisations still want Essay - 1

Despite the rhetoric of employee engagement, organisations still want to exert tighter catch - Essay ExampleDespite the positive results of employee engagement, the organisations exert tighter control on the employees so as to turn over them more disciplined and increase the productivity (Brief & Weiss 2002).Taylorism or scientific management aims at simplifying and optimizing the jobs so as to increase the productivity of the employees. The theory depicts that the employees and managers should cooperate so as to maintain a good recounting (Parker 2005). According to Frederick Taylor, the workers are motivated by the money so they should be offered fair days pay and he also mentioned that if the workers failed to achieve the goal for the day he/she does not deserve to be paid as high as a productive worker. Taylorism highlighted efficiency and does not concentrate on the employee welfare. The theory detailed that few workers are efficient compared to other hence they should be mot ivated with higher(prenominal) incentives. The main purpose of the essay is to highlight the reason why organisations exert tighter control on the employees contempt positive result of employee engagement in light of Taylorism.In the past few decades, employee engagement has gained jut due to its successful results in organizations. A number of researchers are executed on this topic in order to understand whether it has helped in developing good relationship between employees and managers. According to Holbeche & Springett (2003), employee engagement is outlined as the combination of different commitments, which are made by the employees to the organization it also aims at adding order for assisting the colleagues. However, Schmidt (2004) has defined employee engagement as the relationship between satisfaction and commitment in job. Here, satisfaction refers to the horny or attitudinal elements wherein, commitment indicates motivational and physical elements of the individuals. He